中医临床研究数据库
中医临床研究
在线投稿
过刊浏览

中医综合疗法治疗中风后遗症74例临床疗效观察

浏览数:356 

任德启1   刘志勇2

1.河南中医学院第二附属医院,河南  郑州,4500022.河南中医学院,河南  郑州,450046

中图分类号:R255.2       文献标识码:A    文章编号:1674-7860(2016)18-0048-03   证型:BDG

 】目的:观察中医综合疗法对中风后遗症的治疗效果。方法:随机将148例中风后遗症的患者分成治疗组和对照组,每组74例。治疗组使用中医综合疗法进行治疗,对照组使用西医常规方案进行治疗,分析比较两组治疗后的疗效。结果:①治疗组的总有效率为94.6%,对照组的总有效率为68.9%,两组相比,治疗组的总有效率明显优于对照组,两组比较具有显著性差异(P0.05)。②在改善神经功能缺损方面,治疗组优于对照组,两组比较具有显著性差异(P0.05)。③在改善日常生活活动能力方面,治疗组优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:中医综合疗法在治疗中风后遗症方面具有较为优越的临床疗效,值得进一步临床推广使用。

关键词】中医综合疗法;中风后遗症;临床疗效

AbstractObjective: To observe the effect of Traditional ChineseMedicine comprehensive therapy on stroke sequelae . Method: 148 cases of strokesequelae patients were randomLy divided into treatment group and control groupwith 74 cases in each group. TCM treatment group was treated using combinationtherapy for treatment and control group was treated using conventional Westernmedicine treatment plan, the efficacy of the two groups were analyzed aftertreatment. Result: The total effective rate of the treatmentgroup was 94.6% and that of  the controlgroup was 68.9%. Comparison of  totalefficiency between the groups showed that effective rate of the treatment groupwas better than that of control group, and difference was significant (P <0.05). Neurological deficit improvement in the treatment groupwas better than that in the control group, the two groups have significantdifference (P<0.05). Improvement in the daily living activities was betterin the treatment group than the control group, the two groups have significantdifference (P <0.05). Conclusion:TCM comprehensive therapy has more superior clinical efficacy in the treatmentof stroke sequelae, so it is worthy of further clinical use.

KeywordsTCM comprehensive therapy; Stroke sequelae; Clinical efficacy

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7860.2016.18.021


在线客服
 
 
 工作时间
周一至周五 :8:30-17:00
周六至周六 :8:30-17:00
 联系方式
地址:北京市樱花园东街甲4号
邮箱:cccjcm@163.com
电话:010-59420369
全站搜索
 
 
请关注我们