中医临床研究数据库

观察对比腰椎间盘突出MRI与CT诊断的应用价值

浏览数:363 

丁启星

(日照市人民医院,山东  日照,276800

中图分类号:R681.533.1    文献标识码:A    文章编号:1674-7860(2016)15-0104-02   证型:AGB

 】目的:对比分析MRICT在腰椎间盘突出症诊断中的应用效果。方法:抽选我院收治的47例腰椎间盘突出症患者作为观察对象,先后给予其MRICT检查,对比分析检查结果。结果:所有患者均经病理检查确诊,其中,MRI检查确诊率为97.9%;同CT确诊的85.1%相比差异显著(P0.05)。结论:同CT检查相比,MRI检查准确率更高,但临床上医生需具体结合患者情况选择对应检查方法,并积极采用两种方法相结合的方式来提升临床确诊率。

关键词】腰椎间盘突出;MRICT

AbstractObjective:To compare the application effect of MRI and CT in the diagnosis of lumbar discherniation. Methods:47 cases oflumbar disc herniation patients treated in our hospital were selected as theobservation objects and were given MRI and CT examination; the examinationresults were compared and analyzed. Results: All patients were confirmed bypathological examination, the diagnosis rate of MRI was 97.9%, and that of CTwas 85.1%, the difference was significant (P0.05). Conclusion:Compared with CT examination, the accuracy of MRI examination was higher,but the clinical doctor should be specific in choosing correspondingexamination method based on the patient's situation and should actively apply twomethods to enhance the clinical diagnosis rate.

KeywordsProtrusionof lumbar intervertebral disc; MRI; CT

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7860.2016.15.050

参考文献:

[1]刘东旭.腰椎间盘突出MRICT诊断的应用价值比较[J].当代医学,2013,19(08):99-100.

[2]程春,陈蕾,梁晓航,.腰椎间盘突出MRICT诊断的应用的价值分析[J].中国CTMRI杂志,2014,12(07):91-92+119.

[3]张丽娟.腰椎间盘突出患者运用MRICT诊断的价值对比研究[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2015,15(82):9-10.


详情请浏览《中医临床研究》2016第15期


在线客服
 
 
 工作时间
周一至周五 :8:30-17:00
周六至周六 :8:30-17:00
 联系方式
地址:北京市樱花园东街甲4号
邮箱:cccjcm@163.com
电话:010-59420369
全站搜索